← Back to PopSpill Daily

Andrew Garfield Admits He'd Do Spider-Man Again — andrew…

Persona #3 · Vol: 2000
In news that has shocked absolutely no one with a pulse and a functioning memory of the last three years, Andrew Garfield has once again publicly flirted with the idea of putting the spandex back on. The 41-year-old actor, who famously got un-cancelled by an entire generation of chronically online fans after showing up in *Spider-Man: No Way Home* and immediately stealing every scene he was in, told a recent interview that he'd "never say never" to swinging around again. Groundbreaking. Truly. Somewhere, a Sony executive just felt a chill run down their spine and a vision of a blank check with Garfield's name on it. Let's recap, because the internet has the memory of a goldfish on Adderall. Garfield was Peter Parker in two movies, got unceremoniously dumped by the studio after *The Amazing Spider-Man 2* underperformed, and spent the next decade being asked about it at every single press junket until he developed a facial expression that can only be described as "please, I'm begging you, ask me about *Tick, Tick... Boom!*" Then he lied to everyone's face about being in *No Way Home*, showed up anyway, saved MJ, got the redemption arc the fans demanded, and cried on cue. The man has range. Now he's out here saying he loves the character, loves the fans, and would consider coming back. Which is Hollywood-speak for "if the script isn't garbage and the paycheck is right, sure." And honestly? Fair. Get that bag, king. Your mortgage on that house you probably bought in the Hollywood Hills isn't gonna pay itself. Here's the thing nobody wants to admit: Garfield was actually *good* as Spider-Man. His movies were messy — the villains were doing community theater, the scripts felt like they were written by a focus group, and the whole "Peter's parents were secret agents" subplot was a hate crime against storytelling. But Garfield himself? He had the charm, the quips, and the physicality. He's the only one of the three who looked like he could actually do the web-slinging himself, and rumor has it he did most of his own stunts. That's not nothing. The internet, predictably, has lost its collective mind. Trending on X within minutes. Reddit threads with 40,000 upvotes. Fan edits set to sad indie music. Somebody's already written 12,000 words of fanfiction about a *Amazing Spider-Man 3* that will never happen. It's a beautiful, deeply unhinged time to be alive. But let's be real for a second. Tom Holland is still the current Spider-Man. He's got his own trilogy wrapping up, a rumored *Avengers: Secret Wars* appearance, and the face of a guy who's genuinely confused about why everyone keeps asking him about the multiverse. Sony isn't going to launch a competing Spider-Man franchise while Holland is still actively swinging. That's not how corporate synergy works, and you know it. What Garfield is actually signaling is that he's open to a cameo. A one-off. A little multiverse pop-in to make the fans squeal and generate 800 articles exactly like this one. Which is fine. That's the business. But the *Amazing Spider-Man 3* dream? Put it to bed, folks. It's not happening. The horse is not just dead, it's been dead for a decade and somebody's still trying to saddle it. **Our take:** Garfield returning would be a fun little treat, but let's not pretend a full solo movie is on the table. He's a great actor who deserves better than being permanently tied to a franchise that fumbled him twice. Let him do his Broadway thing and collect his Oscar. The man's earned it.
Continue Reading